The most progressive leaders are experimenting with new means of sustaining their firm's innovative spirit as the business scales. Non-traditional structures and revolutionary management paradigms keep company cultures fresh and inspiring, capable of creating the next generation of market disruptions. This organizational insurrection has its
roots in the tech sector.
Life in a start-up can be both exhilarating and
debilitating. Fueled with passion,
purpose and an us-against-the-world mindset, youthful teams work flat out. Speed is everything in the race to outmaneuver
the marketplace. The relentless pace
coupled with urgency to deliver creates a work environment once described to me
as “The Blender”. Some thrive in this whirlwind while others get
chopped up.
“Blender” causalities can be quickly forgotten in a quest to
move forward. Turnover is part of the
game. New teammates, expanding roles,
office moves and milestone celebrations became typical in the start-up space.
In this fevered landscape, workplace basics are often
overlooked. Inexperienced leaders deal
with the needs of a growing staff on the fly or not at all. Without a clear plan, even young companies can
fall back into traditional office structures.
Command-and-control hierarchies, functionally based teams, and
approval/compliance policies crop up unexpectedly. Soon the accompanying organizational friction grinds innovation to a halt and revenue growth
falters.
Navigating a business through such a tenuous stage of the company’s lifecycle is a challenge
for Founders and start-up leaders. By testing new structural models and entrusting their staff with more autonomy and authority, pioneering firms are transforming the workplace and enabling their teams to thrive.
A Collaborarchy™ is new organizational paradigm for
sustaining innovation. When integrated
together, the five dynamics of this model facilitate the collaboration, connection
and engagement needed to scale a high growth business.
The development of
autonomous, cross-functional teams is a good place to start.
These self-directed
groups are not waiting for assignments from above. Aligned with the Purpose, Mission and Values
of the firm, teams are setting their own course. Successful units leverage the collective
wisdom of all team members – holding to the tenet that nobody is smarter than everybody.
Collaboration is fluid because team discussions are not
dominated by a few and decisions are not railroaded into action. The quality of conversations with one another is paramount. With the proper meeting protocol, all team members can feel safe to participate in stand-ups or weekly gatherings knowing their input is both respected and valued.
Management trusts the judgment of the team and
empowers them to solve customer problems, prioritize projects
and resolve conflict. In return, the
team must be diligent and disciplined when appropriating funds and allocating
scarce resources.
With autonomy comes accountability.
Each group takes ownership for delivering on their promises to
customers, management and teammates.
Visibility into the team’s progress is critical. Each unit defines their metrics and
milestones and posts reports publicly on their advancement toward goals. And
there is no finger pointing if they come up short. Being on the hook is the price one pays for
autonomy.
The design and structure of teams is area of potential
stagnation, fertile ground for bureaucracy to sprout. Teams often form naturally around traditional
functional lines. Working with peers in
our own field feels comfortable, a safe haven in an intense workplace.
Here’s the problem: functional
teams are not in the best interest of the customer. These team structures are internally
focused. Their daily agenda is functionally directed not customer driven.
Resistance to changing functional teams is high. Before defending the status quo, consider asking your customers' perspective. See how many would organize your firm by functions or departments rather than an end-to-end customer experience. If the customer is truly our boss, then we will structure our teams around their needs first.
Resistance to changing functional teams is high. Before defending the status quo, consider asking your customers' perspective. See how many would organize your firm by functions or departments rather than an end-to-end customer experience. If the customer is truly our boss, then we will structure our teams around their needs first.
Many firms use customer-centric Project Teams to tackle high priority initiatives or critical deliverables. They experience the speed and agility possible with a broader base of input and collective thinking.
Cross-functional teams start with a customer-oriented Purpose, a common mission that inspires the group to serve the needs of their
customer set above all else. Team decisions
are based on fulfilling this Purpose. The team's day-to-day interactions need the perspectives of those speaking regularly with customers (i.e. Customer Service, Biz Dev, Acct. Development,
Marketing, and Operations) as well as Product, Engineering and Tech. While team members can call
on the expertise of their functional colleagues, collaborating with a more diverse group enables them to serve the customer best.
Inspired by a customer mission and empowered to tap the collective creativity of all team members, autonomous,
cross-functional teams can continually deliver innovation as a business
scales.
In the next post, we will address another key organizational dynamic:
Distributed Authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment